CERN’s safety reports, made by employees of the company, against the Laws of the European Union that expect an Independent panel of scientists to study environmental risks, are based in 4 false statements:
- That black holes made at CERN will evaporate, which is false, as there is no experimental evidence of this bizarre theory that requires travel in time to the past, and denies Einstein’s well proved Relativity Theory, which states all black holes accrete matter regardless of its ‘relative size’.
- That CERN will produce cosmic rays, which is false since we never have seen deconfined quarks in cosmic rays. And indeed, we show here internal documents of CERN which expressly state their collisions of hadrons will produce phenomena never found in cosmic rays, contradicting the ‘safety statements’ sold to the press.
- That atoms of strange liquid will not be produced because collisions are hot, which is false, as it has been already proved experimentally: the first, unstable atoms of strangelets, kaons and hyperons, have been produced in greater quantities than expected. And indeed, again internal documents from ‘Team CASTOR’, the detector of strangelets built by CERN show that CERN expects to produce around 500 stable strangelets each month, (which could fall to the center of the Earth and devour it in a brief period of time.)
- That we are safe because ‘the Earth is still here’; and so the probabilities of catastrophic conversion of the Earth into dark matter are minimal. Which is false; because CERN should calculate the probabilities of existence of dark matter and existence of planets where intelligent life has survived for the entire Galaxy, which is the ecosystem in which this planet survives or not. And it turns out that 96% of the galaxy is dark matter and dark energy, so dark matter conversions of planets into quark stars happen all the time. It turns out there are billions of planets but we do not detect any sign of radio from Intelligent Life (Fermi paradox), only from quark stars. So planets must be disappearing eaten or converted by physicists into MACHOs of dark matter (strange stars and black holes) all the time.
Evaporating black holes.
Because time has causality from past to future and information exists in the Universe, the theory Mr. Hawking calls ‘quantum entropy’, which hypothesizes that black holes travel to the past and evaporate information is false. This absurdity, denies Einstein’s theory of mass and breaks the 3 proofs of truth of the scientific method: logical consistency, mathematical accuracy and experimental evidence.
It breaks the logic of science, based in time causality.
- Mr. Hawking affirms that anti-particles travel to the past, because they have an anti-clock motion, which in physics where time is defined as a change in the motion of beings, v=s/t, it means only to move anti-clockwards NOT to move to the past. Then he affirms that those antiparticles, if falling into a black hole will in fact be traveling to the past towards the black hole, which is like saying they are coming from inside the black hole towards the future, evaporating it. But those antiparticles are not traveling to the past, neither there is any reason why more antiparticles than particles will fall into the black hole. All this imaginative fiction thinking contradicts the main laws of Thermodynamics that define ‘entropy’:
- The 1st law of Thermodynamics: information never disappears in the Universe. Thus, the black hole doesn’t destroy but it creates information, stored in the rotational frequency of its mass vortex.
- The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics: Heat transfers from the hot to the cold source. Thus, a hot black hole doesn’t get hotter and evaporates in our cold environment but it heats and evaporates our matter, absorbing it. As a hot iron cools down and evaporates cold water in a forge. Thus, we will be the evaporated water and the dense hot black hole, the iron…
Stephen Hawking also stated that ‘Einstein is double wrong’, denying the main Laws of Relativity, which affirm that size is absolutely relative in a Universeof infinite fractal scales(link to pdf: fractaluniverse) and black holes never evaporate.
Hawking however says that small black holes will follow quantum laws. This is absurd since quantum theory is NOT the theory of the small but merely the theory of lineal, electroweak forces and black holes follow the cyclical laws of gravitational masses. In simple terms, a rat is a rodent regardless of size, and so a shrew will never become an insect, whatever its size is.
Further on, if black holes are, as Einstein thought, made of an ultra-dense substance, beyond its ‘cut-off’ event horizon, which can only be quarks, they will never evaporate, but they will be Frozen stars. This has been recently proved by the leading quantum cosmologist, since a 5th dimensional black hole made of strings is equivalent to a 4 dimensional black hole made of quark-gluon liquid.
Experimental errors.
For 30 years we tried to find black holes evaporating and never found one. Recently the Fermi satellitewas launched to find evaporating black holes and it mapped out with incredible detail 1500 gamma-ray sources and none was the signature of an evaporating black hole. Last year a dumb hole, which is a black hole that absorbs sound phonons instead of photons, was created at Haifa and it sucked in all the sound around it that never evaporated.
Mathematical errors.
Mr. Hawking used simple lineal equations. Since he worked 40 years ago, when there were not even computers, and so he could not model the cyclical mass vortices of black holes, as we do today in complexity with non-lineal, fractal equations.
Indeed, Mr. Hawking like Mr. Higgs ignores all about fractal relativity and the description of masses as vortices of space-time, which carry the physical information of the Universe in its rotational frequency. It is precisely for that reason that black holes do not evaporate information. On the contrary, they create the information of the Universe
Finally, Mr. Hawking believes that ‘mathematicalequations’ are truth per se. So he invents them first and then tries to find his equations in the real Universe. But Gödel proved that mathematics is a language in which fantasies could be written.
His black holes are indeed a fantasy, which fails the 3 proofs of truth of the scientific method, experimental evidence, logic consistency (it breaks most laws of science) and mathematical accuracy. And yet CERN pretends us to die to prove a science fiction.
Cosmic Rays
CERN says the LHC will create harmless cosmic rays, like those entering the Earth’s atmosphere, and therefore, they claim, the experiments pose no danger, because cosmic rays have not blasted the Earth already. This is false and misleading. The LHC is a factory of quark-gluon soups not of cosmic rays. Thus it will not create cosmic rays because:
- No one has ever found deconfined quarks in cosmic rays.
- 99 percent of cosmic rays are lonely protons and light helium atoms. Thus, as we explained before, those lonely atoms cannot gather enough critical mass to detonate a mass-bomb (M=E/c2) and provoke a big-bang; as the ultra-dense massive quark-gluon soup that the LHC manufactures will do. Indeed, the luminosity (number of atoms per colliding bunch) at LHC’s collisions is 1028 times bigger than a single cosmic ray. Further on, the LHC pushes those billions of atoms together laterally with a system called ’stochastic cooling’ to increase their density, at the same time that it accelerates them to light speed. Thus, at the point of collision it bunches obtain densities able to trigger a mass-reaction that Nature only reaches when stars explode into super-novas.
- The Fermi satellite has proved that cosmic rays are the debris of super-novas, which fly away from each other in an infinite radius relative to the Earth (as they explode in all directions from their source). Thus, these rays always arrive separated and weakened. Thus CERN is misleading mankind confusing the mass-bombs the LHC will produce, quark gluon soups that detonate stars, with the debris – the cosmic rays blasted on those explosions. CERN will manufacture the bomb. Cosmic rays are the debris. The cynicism is obvious: it is like confusing the murderer with the victim.
Unfortunately CERN practices the fundamental law of rhetoric, explained by the inventor of industrial propaganda, Mr. Goebbels: ‘if you repeat a lie many times, people will believe it’. So CERN constantly lies, repeating that it will make harmless cosmic rays.
Indeed, CERN in its internal documents expressly states that it expects to find in the Hadron collisions (lead to lead) starting this 11/9, phenomena that cannot happen in Cosmic rays, as this document extracted from its conferences show – precisely the creation of stable strangelets that it denies in all its LSAG reports. This is the duplicity of this company that systematically lies to the press and the public that pays its bills, reason why we sued them for criminal negligence:
Strangelets are mini-novas, hot in the surface but cold inside.
CERN said it wouldn’t create strange liquid because LHC’s collisions are very hot. But this information is misleading. Only the external cover of a big-bang is very hot, as in a refrigerator; precisely because the cover expels the energy from the inside and cools down the center, where the strangelet quark liquid is forming.
CERN in fact knows this, because in the internal documents leaked by our ‘whistle-blower’ it states precisely what we have always said, that at higher temperatures/energy more of it will become mass (E=mc2) and so it expects to create stable strangelets the 11/9, and in the Powerpoint presentations of Team CASTOR, in charge of detecting those strangelets it affirms it will produce 500 strangelets a month:
This creation of strangelets that the team CASTOR expressly considers to happen ‘likely’ (though in its public statements CERN adamantly denies so), must be explained according to the properties of the quark-gluon CERN will produce - the first drops of the liquids that cause Super-Novas: Those explosive liquids provoke a dual big-crunch and big bang. The big-bang expels externally radiation while crunching inside quarks into a super-cold vortex of perfect liquid, the strange liquid or stranglet.
In Nature, quark-gluon soups collapse constantly stars into cold black holes and pulsars, while expelling radiation.
In Complexity, our speciality, we study them with the main equation of Time Duality, which states that all systems of Energy and Information are complementary and their informative and energetic arrows are in balance. So we write:
E / I = K.
Yet far from equilibrium liquids achieve that Complementarity by moving its energetic and informative parameters to the extreme.
This means that a quark gluon soup that creates a supernova is a dual process:
Big-bang (extreme temperature) / Big-crunch (superfluid, informative order) = K.
Thus, in a quark-gluon liquid or supernova the electronic cover of its atoms explode outwards at enormous temperature/speed, while the quark particles inside the liquid form an ultra-cold super fluid vortex, crunching the Earth’s mass into a frozen star.
And at the end of the process we will see a small frozen star in the center of a exploding nebulae of radiation.
We have now experimental evidence of this far from equilibrium Dualityas a few drops of strangelet made at RHIC, behaved as we predicted, NOT as CERN, who expected only a hot gas, had said. At RHIC they created a super-hot, exploding mini-nova, while in the center, quarks collapsed into an ultracold, superfluid vortex.
Further on, CERN created in December many more strange quarks(kaons) than it said. In these early experiments with only 13% more energy than RHIC strange quark production increased geometrically. Thus, with 1000th times more energy the LHC will create enough strange quarks to form stable strangelets, according to all kind of theoretical papers; since the stability and sustainability of any mass-bomb reaction is directly proportional to the critical mass. RHIC created an unstable ‘fetus’, a seed without enough critical mass to make the big-crunch of the Earth self-sustained.
The Earth has not yet become dark matter, because we are very lucky.
The Safety Report made by CERN’s employees about the quark factory is not focused at all in the quark factory and the quark gluon liquids it will produce, but the bulk of it, studies the safety of Neutron stars. This is absurd. Imagine a factory of missiles that would not talk about missiles but study the safety of Saturn’s rings. It would do so NOT to talk about missiles, because it knows missiles are dangerous.
Then it focuses in its rhetoric lie, saying that it will produce cosmic rays and we are safe because cosmic rays (which is not in any case what the LHC will produce) have NOT converted the Earth and the moon into black holes or strangelets of dark matter and we ‘are still here’.
Even if the LHC were a factory of cosmic rays this hypothesis is an statistical argument and therefore must be applied statistically to the galaxy, its planets and the galactic proportion of dark matter, NOT only to the Earth:
Astronomers believe that 96% of the galaxy is made of dark energy and dark matter, whose only known-known component can be Massive Halo Objects, MACHOsof quark matter, strangelets and black holes. Thus strange stars and black holes are all over the galaxy andthe conversion of light matter into dark matter must be very common in the Universe; since all radio-signals come from quark stars, NOT from intelligent life.
What this means is that over 99% of planets have not made it beyond this point of technological history. It is the Fermi paradox, first expressed by Fermi, after seeing the effects of his Nuclear Bomb, when he said that perhaps there is no Intelligent Life in the Universe, because all planets are destroyed by Nuclear Physicists.
Finally, black holes which have eaten the mass of the moon would produce exactly the same background radiation at 2.7 k degrees that inundates the Universe. They are in fact in ‘fractal cosmology’, which considers a Universenot born in a big-bang but made of infinite fractal scales, recently proved experimentally, the original source of the background radiation. So MACHOs eat planets and moons all the time.
All this means that the real statistical chances of becoming dark matter, according to this final ‘safety argument’ are even greater than the one we calculate in this web: over 90%. We are the exceptional planet that has still survived, but CERN will soon try to solve that…
PDF: Safety Standards: Lies and Statistics
